The Jurisprudence Of Floydism

The ideology of George Floyd has effected everything; school names have had to change because of it, institutions have radically reoriented themselves because of it, billions of dollars have flowed from corporations because of it, the biggest state in the union is giving reparations because of it; and soon because of it being black (or even brown or yellow or red or anything but White) will be a silver bullet because of it, and will get the perpetrator off; we're not quite there yet, but we will be soon enough and the state of Washington is leading the way; the Supreme Court there has said if you are black that's a factor that can be taken in to account to set you free.

Of course this is nothing short of a license to kill.    For all intents and purpose they might as well be issuing them 

They say that blackness will be a mitigating factor when everyone knows it's an aggravating factor which is all the difference in the world.  But the way it will play out mitigating will be the least of it--it will set them scot free.  And in the midst of this crime spree called the Black Lives Matter movement you know where this is heading: it will make the Ferguson Effect, and the Floyd Effect look like child's play.  You see we have had a Supreme Court of a state officially state if you are black there will be a presumption that the police did wrong; the scales of justice, far from being blind, will be weighted towards them; in this noxious environment what police officer will want to take the proactive lead to arrest a black man?  Hell, if he's not careful he'll be pariah and end up in a holocaust museum as exhibit A.

It's happened before.  

No, better to retire to that donut shop and let that black man maul and murder and rape and knock off--what's a cop to do when the negro is the idol of society? 

Hell, the cops themselves worship the negro. 

And the Court in question is the Great Replacement in action.  Among the noxious nine there is only one White male and he's a dyed in the wool communist.   The others are a motely array of race scum and sexual deviants, so it's not surprising that they put the ideology of Floydism in to effect effectively saying that if you are black and you commit a crime you'll be sure to walk.   That is, it's not surprising that they announced a land mark case in American law announcing that henceforth it's open season on White people. 

You see this is the rainbow court of the rainbow future.  And it's only the beginning. 

So now White people are fair game; they will have no recourse to the law (the law which we created); police, lawyers, judges will all be in a great cabal against them.   A White person touches one hair on the darkie's frizzy or nappy or wooly heads and the book will be thrown at them; a black does anything to a White person and they'll waltz away free as a bird.

How far is this off? 

"The Washington State Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person’s race, and law enforcement’s long history of discrimination against people of color, should be taken into account when determining the legality of police seizures."

That's not right.   The Court ruled that it must be taken in to account.  

"The court also clarified state law to say police have seized a person if an objective observer would conclude that the person was not free to leave or refuse a request. But, the court wrote, that objective observer must be aware that discrimination and biases have resulted in disproportionate police contacts, investigative seizures, and uses of force against Black, Indigenous, and other people of color.”

This case was tied in to a fairly arcane matter of what constitutes a seizure.   But out of the gobbledygook of the case law they plucked a black dagger to make startling law.   To say that blacks are above the law and the law is a sledgehammer against Whites.  It is said that hard case make bad law; but negro cases make lawlessness.

This is merely formalizing what has been the case for a long time by now.  

Up will be down and down will be up in this Orwell meets Alice world.   This putative "objective observer" will be as subjective as can be.   A black person did you say?   Send him home.   We can't prosecute him.   Were the black man to be convicted he'd have the stellar appeal: he's black.    Any appeals Court that idolizes blacks  would overturn the conviction on that basis alone.

And they all idolize blacks. 

“Today, we formally recognize what has always been true: In interactions with law enforcement, race and ethnicity matter, Justice Mary Yu wrote for unanimous court.  Therefore, courts must consider the race and ethnicity of the allegedly seized person as part of the totality of the circumstances when deciding whether there was a seizure.”

Here we come to it.  And this is not some crackpot in the African-American Studies Department at Harvard (though that crackpot influenced it); this is not some guy at the barbershop or on the bar stool; this is not some guy on a soap box or a defense attorney, or a journalist, or member of an NGO, or a Human Rights committee at the UN; no, this is the Supreme Court of one of the fifty states. 

And they've just penned the road map for setting the black man free for all eternity. 

"Mary Isabel Yu is an American jurist of the Washington Supreme Court.  She is the state's first openly gay, Asian, and Latina Justice.  Yu was born in Illinois to a Chinese father and a Mexican mother."

Were this hack a cripple she'd have checked all the boxes but as it is she's just mental cripple.  From the looks of her she appears to be a very short man who in better days would have been speaking pidgin English saying "no tickie, no laundry."

These are the kinds of people we have allowed to rule over us. These are the kinds of people we have allowed to blaze the trail of our destruction. 

For some reason this mutt is making law in the land of Ben Franklin.

"The Washington state Supreme Court may be the most diverse high court in the country. Among the nine justices there is only one white man. There are seven women, four people of color, three Jewish justices, two lesbians, the court’s first Indigenous justice and a Black immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago.

Fags, wogs, the indigenous, Hebes, the whole disgusting rainbow coalition.  This is not Edward Coke's English Common Law.   In fact there is nothing English about it.   They've taken a glorious body of law and twisted it beyond recognition.   They've taken law created by White men, put their wicked dark stamp on it, and mobilized it a weapon against its creators.  

Thanks, Jews.


Imagine having a case precedent based on someone named "Palla Sum."   Not Bill Nelson, of Albert Smith mind you--no, Palla Sum.  And this deadbeat race scum has rights!  And based on his rights we'll have none.

You can bank of that. 

"The case concerns Palla Sum, a person of color, who was sleeping in his car in Tacoma one morning in April 2019 when police came upon him. An officer ran his plates and determined the car was not stolen.  The officer knocked on the window, asked Sum questions and asked him for identification."

We used to be able to roust these deadbeats no problem.   A man sleeping in car is inherently suspicious and getting him "to move along" used to be what law enforcement did.   But now a man sleeping in his car is in his castle if he's a person of color.   Can't touch him.   The irony being that a White man in his home is not considered to be in his castle, he's fair game for the police.  

"Sum gave a false name and the officer went back to his cruiser to check records. Sum then drove off, crashed into a front lawn and was caught as he attempted to run away."

So much for Sum.   No sympathy for sum.  In sum he's a race menace that needs to be removed from our midst. But the name Palla Sum is destined to go down in the history books as the man on whose case the judges crossed the Dark Rubicon.   That is when they formally inscribed in to law the fact that we have a two tier justice system and that being dark of skin is a get out of jail free card.

Were it not so tragic it would be really remarkable. 

"Sum was subsequently charged with making a false statement, attempting to flee police and unlawful possession of a firearm, after a gun was found in his car."

Told you he was suspicious.   A drifter with a gun tries to flee police and immediately crashes in to someone's lawn.  Typical race scum and  a typical menace.  Do they really want to build landmark case law on trash like this.   Yes they do, yes they do.   

Race trash especially.  

"But Sum argued his statements to police should be inadmissible, because he was unlawfully seized by police after the officer asked for his identification and said there had been car thefts in the area."

The National Socialists reoriented German criminal law so that it protected society from criminals; the current American way which began in the 1960s is to protect criminals from society.   

How long would it have taken the Germans back then to dispose of garbage like Palla Sum?   It's the question that answers itself.  

“A reasonable person in Sum’s position would not have felt free to ignore the officer, Sum’s lawyers wrote. They urged the court to adopt a new standard, for what constitutes an illegal seizure. The hypothetical reasonable person should be familiar with patterns of policing in America and the risks a person of color takes in walking away from or disregarding police interaction.”

Read that paragraph again.   Because it is the linchpin "reasoning," it is the tip of the high-sounding mumbo-jumbo.  It is the fulcrum of the fairy dust they are about to throw in your eyes.   The vague "patterns of policing" refers to the fact that the police have more contact (per capita) with people of color.   It's also true that duck hunters have more contact with ducks than they do with elephants.  The (intentionally) missing piece here is that people of color commit an astronomically higher number of crimes than do White people because they are criminally disposed race trash.  And then the liars that they are they'll turn the fact that the coloreds are criminally prone to make them look like victims and give them even more leeway to commit more crimes with no consequences.

And so the circle close, and the noose tightens.  It's not sleight of hand, it's an egregious carnival of deceit meant to cow the White man into subservience.  

So now a "reasonable person" is supposed to infer that the Palla Sums of the world are being picked on by the police for their being colored.   A reasonable eight year old could see through it.  But the Justices of the highest court of Washington State are so blinkered by the brainwashing they can't see through it, or they are in on the scam and do it intentionally.  

And once they've slipped this illegitimate logic under the front door of the court house they have their platform to seize the rest of your freedom and soon your life.   Now it's the issue of "seizures" soon it will be the entire panoply of the law.   Blacks and other people of color will be more than a protected class, they will be the locked and loaded and licensed shock troops in the war of white genocide.

No policeman will arrest them; no court will convict them. 

Here's a black man who robs---let him go.  Here's a black man who rapes--let him go.   Here's black man who murders--let him go.

The future is a black man walking away forever. 

"Sum petitioned to the Supreme Court, arguing the law should consider the effect of race during police contacts.  
So at question for the Supreme Court was this: Are race and ethnicity factors in those situations?  The justices said yes."

Oh yes they did.  And the way the law works is that future case law is based on precedence, and they now have the precedent of precedents.   A black person can be let off because he's black.  They'll couch it in more complex and obscure language than that but that's what it will mean.  

"The State of Washington argued that Sum didn’t provide any evidence that Pierce County officers were more likely to discriminate or be violent against Asian or Pacific Islander people, or that Rickerson was influenced by Sum’s race."

Ah these people are already behind the time.   No proof of "racism" will ever need be adduced because no racism exists.  Being black (or yellow or brown or red) means that ipso fact they were abused.  It's a legal free for all for the darkies; which is not surprising because it's the darkies who are writing the law.  


It's the meeting that will go down in lore.   Just a couple of traitors meeting in a parking lot and damned if they weren't outraged at some racism!  George Floyd has just had the life beautifully snuffed out of him and the world was going on a lunatic bender and these two judges happened upon each other and by god they were going to do something about it.   This was high dramas indeed, the famous meeting, one that will be told around decaying and decrepit neighborhoods in the future and the tellers try to cook their scrounged food and keep the rats away.  They will tell tall tales about the letter heard round the world. 

"Two years ago, as protests spurred by the murder of George Floyd gripped the nation, two Washington state Supreme Court justices bumped into each other in the parking lot."

Fateful serendipity that.   The images of poor Geroge hopped up on drugs and resisting arrest was more than these two stooges could stand.   The White man had to fall!

“All of us who work in the system felt a sense of heaviness about what was going on, Yu recalled. Stephens had been thinking the court should say something. They talked about it in the parking lot. It was very casual.  There was a level of spontaneity to it, Yu said. Everybody was feeling something, we can’t just sit here and be silent.”

You can't be silent in the face of White Supremacy can you?  And so the two lackeys for the black man penned a letter, a letter which (by rights) ought to be grounds for appeal for any White man appearing in any Court in the state.  Judges are not supposed to opine on politics.  If they do inevitably they will appear biased.  But this was the our Savior Floyd, saint of saints, the holy man of holy men, the canonized of the canonized, and little rules like custom and propriety could be thrown out the window.   Hell White CEOs were shining negro shoes that fateful summer, you think anyone is going to question a strongly worded letter from some supreme court justices championing anti-racism?  

Hell no they're not!

"Yu went home, wrote a draft and emailed it to her colleagues. They hashed out some edits over Zoom.   The end result was published on June 4 2020 and was signed by all nine members of the Supreme Court."

That is the fags, the sapphic sisters, the gooks, the negroes, the spics, and the White male communist.  

Believe it or not the letter appeared on Washington State Supreme Court letterhead.  This was no matter of personal opinion.  This was anti-White ex cathedra.

In this letter the nefarious nine wrote that the "devaluation and degradation of black lives is no recent event, it is persistent systematic injustice since country's founding."

What this has to do with law or the law with it remains unknown.  What they were doing had nothing to do with law but with lying and laying down a predicate for violating the law.    

The letter of course mentioned Jim Crow (dead for nearly a century), "racialized policing" and then gives the exhortation that they (they!) must use justice to end racism.

And here we thought judges were about justice.  That lady with the blindfold and the scales now has a BLM hat on backward and a black power fist.  All nine should have immediately been impeached and debarred and put on trial.

 "The state Supreme Court, which normally only answers the legal questions presented to it, went out of its way to call on lawyers, judges and courts across the state to do more to address longstanding institutional racism."

Normally?  How quaint!   This is not your father's Supreme Court, these mixed race morons with the weird sexuality don't kowtow to the past.  The past was racist after all.   They don't act as a normal court just calling balls and strikes, they've put on a uniform and are on the field tackling the players from one of the teams.  

The White team, or course.

George Floyd died, don't you recall?   Why, he couldn't breathe!  Whitey have to go down.  

“As judges, we must recognize the role we have played in devaluing black lives, the justices wrote. The legal community must recognize that we all bear responsibility for this on-going injustice, and that we are capable of taking steps to address it, if only we have the courage and the will.”

That sounds like a call to arms.  This is the letter that will be heard around the world.  The letter which paved the way for a carnival of anti-Whiteness, and formed the cornerstone of inscribing in law the rule that no black man can ever be touched by the law. 

"In the two years since their letter, the court has made efforts large and small, symbolic and concrete, trying to move toward a more just legal system. The court has overturned decades-old hateful precedents, with little public notice. It has thrown out laws, vacating tens of thousands of criminal convictions. It has ordered pay raises to thousands of immigrant farmworkers. In many cases, it has moved faster than both the state Legislature and the nation in barring practices that it considered unjust or racially discriminatory."

My goodness, this nasty nine are an anti-racist wrecking crew.  They weren't just talking when they said the law was meaningless, the only thing that holds meaning is White evil.   They clear the decks of any sensible law that was intended to keep Whites safe, they'll clear out death row of the blacks, they'll set the black people free.  A black man murdered his White girlfriend!   White bitch had it coming!  Black man ransacked your house!  Whitey be guilty!  Leasing agreement says no criminals in an apartment complex?  It's Jim Crow all over again.  This crew of mixed race sexual deviants won't be done until every White man is dead and the last Haka dance is done on the last grave. 

"And the court has seen lawyers cite its own letter back to it in legal briefs, arguing for the court to go further in heeding its own clarion call."

This is a sick dynamic, this is vicious circle.  That the White man might die, that that the White man might be exterminated, these judges and lawyers will volley back and forth the anti-White words until there is anti-racism forever, White genocide without end. 


Of course the intellectual backdrop to this "movement" does not exist.  It seems to consist of them noticing that a lot of blacks are in handcuffs and in jail cells.   They wrongly assume equality so they posit that something must be amiss.   The key thing they overlook (intentionally are not) is that people of color are unbridled savages who have no business in a White country, and this lack of the ability to govern their actions will invariably lead them to kill, maim, and rob.  If it's more complicated than that I'll eat my hat.  

"A report from Washington's three law schools issued last fall, found racial disparities at every level of the criminal legal system, from who gets stopped and searched by police, to who is arrested and convicted, to the length of sentences that are handed out."

These are some real sleuths.   They looks at the criminal justice system and see black and brown everywhere.   End of analysis!  Has to be racism.   Because not in ten million years can they admit the stark fact that the dark skinned simply commit more crimes.  No, if that little factoid got out in to the public sphere all hell would break loose for them.  And an entire lie, an entire ideology based on that lie would crumble to bits before there eyes.   Why even to think that blacks commit more crime is racist and soon that will be a crime in itself.   

"A Black person in Washington is still 4.7 times more likely to be incarcerated than a white person."

A fact like this should cause the black community to hang it's collective head in shame and work assiduously to rectify it.  Instead of taking the responsibility for their own feral criminality (which would be costly and painful) they point the finger.   

Now they have high court judges to back them up. 

It's like the old joke about how they always lament that there are more blacks in prison than college.  But when the black man knocks off a liquor store at gun point what's the store clerk going to do, hand the tar monster a Harvard application? 

"Race and racial bias continue to matter in ways that are not fair, that do not advance legitimate public safety objectives, that produce disparities in the criminal justice system, and that undermine public confidence in our legal system, the report said."

This is their one (false) idea and they grab on to it like a rabid dog bites a bone.   a rabid dog.  

"Chief Justice Steven González said the court is not going out of its way to write about institutional racism, but rather is approaching cases cognizant of the role race has played and continues to play in the legal system and in America."

A bean eater as top dog judge?  This guy should be hawking tacos on a streetcorner somewhere.  This guy should be on a dirt farm in Mexico trying to round up the chickens.  This guy should be taking a siesta somewhere, but now he's going to lecture us?  And lie of course, of course they are going out of there way to write about racism.   

“We are not intentionally saying we’re going to write about race now, Gonz├ílez said. We’re not colorblind. We are not pretending that race doesn’t exist. I don’t believe that ignoring it is the right approach. I don’t think it’s going to make it better. I don’t think it’s an equitable way.

Gonzalez did you say?   Got his law degree off a matchbox at Tijuana U, vaulted right away to the top of the profession. 

"Justices cite the court’s decades-old commissions on gender justice, racial minorities and providing interpreters. They point to a court-created task force on race and justice from 2010, in the wake of comments from two former justices who said Black people have a crime problem.”

"Former" being the operative word.   These were two old white guys with their heads reasonably screwed on right who told the truth.  If their pictures still hang somewhere you can be sure some ape like Congoid will tear it down, and they will douse a tire in flames and burn them as the chant voodoo rites. 

"Thursday’s ruling concludes that we formally recognize what has always been true: in interactions with law enforcement, race and ethnicity matter. Therefore, courts must consider the race and ethnicity of the allegedly seized person as part of the totality of the circumstances, the court opinion reads."


"For purposes of this analysis, an objective observer is aware that implicit, institutional, and unconscious biases, in addition to purposeful discrimination, have resulted in disproportionate police contacts, investigative seizures, and uses of force against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) in Washington, the court opinion continues."

This is the writing on the wall.  It's scrawled in cholo graffiti, and it's scrawled in illiterate Ebonics, and with rainbow colors. 

But it's the writing on the wall. 

"The Washington State Supreme Court has ruled that one of the factors is your race and ethnicity — and the way people of certain racial or ethnic groups have historically been treated by law enforcement."

The only factor henceforth.

"Instead, the court’s decision has to do with how non-white people are scrutinized by police — and how that may make them feel as though they are not free to leave a conversation with a cop even if the officer hasn’t explicitly told them they’re detained."

More likely that negroes did something criminal and heinous and they know it and so they feel like they are detained.  Whereas White people know they did noting and so have a free and guiltless mind. 

"Both sides in the case — The State of Washington and Pierce County prosecutors on one, and Sum and his attorney on the other — already agreed that race and ethnicity could be relevant to a seizure."

And that, sirs, was the ballgame.  Even the State conceded the predicate, so the game was lost right then.  Everything beyond that was footnotes. 

"In explaining that ruling, Yu referenced The Talk, a conversation that many parents of color have had with their kids about police for generations: Keep your hands where officers can see them. Don’t make sudden moves. Be polite, don’t argue and follow the officer’s order."

Oh yes that famous "talk."   Not the talk where negros are explained the facts of life, that negros are criminals, and commit all the crime, not that one.  The talk where negro parents tell their kids that the White man is evil and they should get revenge.

That talk. 

"Heightened police scrutiny of the BIPOC community is certainly common enough to establish that race and ethnicity have at least some relevance to the question of whether a person was seized, Yu wrote."

Duck hunters scrutinize ducks too.   Because they are duck hunters.  Before he got on his Jew knees and apologized Mike Bloomberg said the way to solve crime was to take a photo of  generic black teen male, phot copy it, and send it out the precincts. 

“I would say first that police, legal advisors, city attorneys, county prosecutors, they’re going to be absorbing this ruling and thinking about how they advise their clients on changes they need to make in the field,” Pierce County Prosecutor spokesman Adam Faber said in an interview. “That will likely lead to changes in training at the academy and in departments. …

Yes indeed, this will send shockwaves into the bowels of the law, deep dyed and deep down in to the interstitial space of law enforcement.   It will be a chilling effect and the message:  don't arrest a negro.   

"In a statement, King County Department of Public Defense Director Anita Khandelwal lauded the court’s decision and said that only reckoning with the realities of racialized policing can help society move toward a world where non-white people don’t need to fear police encounters.

This Anita Khandelwal is an "Indian-American" (dot, not feather).  She one of the wogs who have flooded in to Washington State, but she decided not to code but to wage war on the White man directly.

“Disproportionate policing, investigative seizures, and the use of force against BIPOC individuals have deeply harmed BIPOC communities, Khandelwal said. What’s noteworthy is the Court’s recognition of this reality. It’s not often that our clients have their truths lifted up in this way.”

What's noteworthy is that we have fags, Hebes, wogs, Jews, spics and gooks running roughshod over a White country.

Everything else it just footnotes. 


And so the Rubicon (or the Zambezi, really) has been crossed.  It's now black letter law all the way down.   It's no Court House or Police Precinct for White men.   

Not too long ago at something preposterously called the American Freedom Tour they had the religiously minded conservative speakers belch their words in front of big sign saying "Time To Win Back America."  Which begs the question: how was it lost?  


1. From 1890 to 1914 millions of Ostjuden migrated to America
2.  1964 Civil Rights Act
3.  1965 Immigration And Nationality Act.

Everything else is just footnotes.

“Today, we formally recognize what has always been true: In interactions with law enforcement, race and ethnicity matter, Justice Mary Yu wrote for the unanimous court. Therefore courts must consider the race and ethnicity of the allegedly seized personas part of the totality of the circumstances when deciding whether there was a seizure.”

Lock your doors gentleman, lock up your daughters, and lock and load, this is Road Warrior coming your way.  

“Centuries of violence and dehumanizing treatment of people of color have required BIPOC communities to develop survival strategies that demand over-compliance with law enforcement.  For courts to continue to blind themselves to that reality when evaluating the freedom an individual would feel to unilaterally terminate a law enforcement contact is to further enshrine existing racial disparities into the legal system.”

Tortuous prose but a death effect:  black people are above the law. 

“We have never stated that race and ethnicity cannot be relevant circumstances, Justice Mary Yu wrote on behalf of the court in their ruling. However, we have not explicitly held that in interactions with law enforcement, race and ethnicity matter. We do so today."

Oh yes they do so today, this is not beating around the bush (behind which a negro lurks), they are not hedging their bets, this is not implicit blackness, no; this is a straight up in your face assault. 

This is no hornet's nest, this is a witches brew, and in this boiling cauldron the bones of White men bake. 

This is the jurisprudence of Floydism.  This is what happens when after seeing those famous nine minutes the nine the squeamish squishes squawk, when the squared away know no life was more justly squelched.

"And that ruling in Sum’s case now sets precedent for all other cases in Washington State."

Now it's black letter law.

"Robert Chang, a law professor and director of the Korematsu Center for Law and Equality at Seattle University, pointed to the longer trajectory of the court, in citing significant changes toward racial equity, even if they happened before the court’s 2020 letter."

That Korematsu fellow was one of those sneaky Japs and he has a Court case named after him too.  He lost the first round in 1944 but four decades later when America had gone soft in the head he finally won.  That war was evil but rounding up and locking up nips is never a bad idea. 

It's letting go that is the problem. 

"The court’s ruling didn’t include any specifics from Sum’s case demonstrating how his race actually factored into the stop. Instead, the court found, Sum’s race was relevant by default due to legal precedent and the history of discrimination in the United States toward people of color."

Read that paragraph one more time, it will repay rereading.  They say there was no evidence whatsoever that Sum was detained due to race--none whatsoever.   But America was racist in the past (hell yeah we were!) so Sum gets off.  It's the long and the short of it.  The sum and substance of it you might say.  The fact that in the past the White man still had balls of steel will now be bandied about, and brandished as a weapon.  America was racist in the past so the black man must go free.  That is their legal argument.  It is not more complicated than that.  These aren't great legal minds, these are soldiers in a race war.  And if you're wondering how we lost our country it's simple: the Jews stole it while we were sleeping.  

It's black letter law by now.

Any questions?


Popular posts from this blog

The Good Jew

Diversity Is Fatal

Repelling The Invaders